bonvur.blogg.se

Pale moon browser review 2017
Pale moon browser review 2017










There are several well-reviewed FF and Chrome clones out there that provide the advantages that Pale Moon formerly did.The team behind the Pale Moon browser announced in a post on the official forum, that the archive server hosting old versions of the software was compromised by hackers and used to spread malware hidden inside the installer files. If you are looking for a new browser, look elsewhere. With version 25's quantum leap in incompatibility, Pale Moon has gone from "niche" to "cult" status. Firefox itself is steadily losing market share, and Pale Moon is a tiny part of the Firefox user base. With version 25, Pale Moon has deliberately made itself incompatible with many more sites and extensions (and with Windows XP), and it demands that all of the developers and users in the world make themselves compatible with Pale Moon. Over the past two years, though, more and more web sites and extensions have refused to work with Pale Moon. Any web site and extension that worked with Firefox could be counted on to work with Pale Moon. As Mozilla lurched from one misguided design decision to another, breaking extensions and frustrating users, Pale Moon kept its traditional, highly functional interface. Pale Moon was an optimized version of Firefox, eliminating some features most people did not use in return for better performance and stability. So I cannot agree with these criticisms, and recommend Pale Moon to everyone who wants to use a less bloated and more customisable browser. Windows XP compatibility is not broken, you only need to use the Atom targeted builds. There are a few web sites that misbehave, but not more than with Chromium.

pale moon browser review 2017

105 extensions enabled and 30 disabled, these all work flawlessly). All of my favourite extensions work (I have atm. With regard to the incompatibilities mentioned in the previous reviews: as of now (Sep 2015) I don't really feel this a big problem. Although PM has its flaws (coming from the Firefox heritage, like high memory consumption), all-in-all I am satisfied with it and use it exclusively. I recently returned to PM after being disappointed in Chromium-based browsers (Opera and SRWare Iron in particular). Reading the latest reviews of Pale Moon (hereafter PM) I felt like writing a review, since I think writing this browser off is a mistake.












Pale moon browser review 2017